What Factors Affect Pentest Costs?
The main factors that influence costs are the test duration, the complexity of the target system, the test depth and type, and the effort required for reports and meetings.
Penetration testing costs can range from a few thousand dollars for small systems to tens of thousands for large, complex networks. Factors that influence pricing include the size of the system being tested, the depth of the testing required, whether it is a Blackbox, Greybox, or Whitebox test, and the specific security expertise required. Additional costs may arise from the need to test custom applications or to perform repeated tests to validate security measures after fixes have been applied, making budgeting for pentests a critical consideration for effective cybersecurity strategy planning.
The pricing of a penetration test is complex and depends on several factors. Understand what drives costs to make informed decisions.
In IT security, the rule is: the more time an attacker has, the more likely they are to achieve their goal. A penetration test that is allowed to run twice as long delivers more and, above all, more solid results.
A target system can be a simple website with few functions - or a complex Software-as-a-Service platform with various interfaces, APIs, and user groups. Testing the latter takes longer and is more complex.
Penetration tests are conducted as black box, grey box, or white box tests. The level of knowledge with which a pentest provider starts the project significantly influences costs. Time for familiarization with source code, documentation, and system architecture should not be neglected.
Often neglected: how much time writing a meaningful report takes. Depending on the type of penetration test, reporting alone can consume up to 15% of the entire budget.
Real examples from our practice. Note: Complexity and scope can vary. These prices serve as guidance and may differ based on requirements.
WordPress/WooCommerce shop with custom plugins and custom theme. Focus on source code review of custom components instead of complete CMS testing.
Software-as-a-Service platform (.NET/Java) with 2-3 user groups. Medium complexity, little data processing, no API. Black box test with test accounts. More on SaaS Pentests
Complex platform with user roles, multi-tenant capability, file processing, SSO/MFA login, and extensive API for third-party providers. Grey box with full documentation.
Targeted identification of interesting individuals and sending phishing emails with links to phishing pages. Proof of which employees are at risk.
Comprehensive research of publicly available information about companies, infrastructure, and employees. Dark web scan for leaked credentials and sensitive data.
Mid-sized company with ~40 services/portals. Perimeter assessment (AWS), asset discovery, evaluation of all services, focused tests on critical assets.
Perfect for smaller projects, MVP launches, or initial security checks. Our Mini Pentest offers a focused analysis of the most critical vulnerabilities - fast, straightforward, and at a transparent fixed price.
So far, we've been able to find a suitable solution for every budget. Here are proven strategies to reduce costs while achieving optimal results.
Systems not prepared for pentests? Empty demo system without relevant data? This wastes unnecessary time. Testers shouldn't have to handle data preparation.
Small budget? Focus on critical areas. Identify high-risk functions and assets where attacks would cause the greatest damage.
Management summary necessary? Or is a technical list with findings and proof of concepts sufficient? Less reporting effort = more time for deeper tests.
Initial test = familiarization. With regular repetition, the same team already knows your systems. More efficient, focused tests.
Standard: 2-3 people (multiple eyes principle). Complementary skills = best results. If needed, a single tester can also handle the project.
Comprehensive system documentation, API specs, architecture diagrams? This massively saves familiarization time and enables deeper tests in less time.
The main factors that influence costs are the test duration, the complexity of the target system, the test depth and type, and the effort required for reports and meetings.
Yes, a black box test requires less specific prior knowledge, whereas grey box and white box tests require deeper familiarization with documents and source code. They are therefore generally more expensive.
It saves time and money. Ensure that the penetration tester has all the necessary information and access rights to perform the test. It's wasteful if time is spent gathering relevant information.
It's not necessary. If the report is clear enough, a meeting can be dispensed with, because of course it takes time and increases the cost of the penetration test.
If a penetration tester already knows the system from the past, they don't have to spend unnecessary time familiarizing themselves with it. They're then faster and can focus on new vulnerabilities.
Yes. A pentest that must be performed by 5 people in parallel is of course more expensive than a test performed by just one person. However, most pentests get by with 1-2 people.
Depending on the scope, one possibility is to consider the number of targets when estimating pentest costs. Additional variables can be: Number of IP addresses, number of services, number of routes in web applications, size of the API, number of parameters in HTTP requests
Yes. If you're only interested in the technical details, we're happy to forgo a report and provide all necessary information, for example via Slack/email as text files or similar.
Of course. Penetration tests can be conducted superficially or in depth. The deeper the test, the more time and therefore money is required.
Have questions about our services? We'd be happy to advise you and create a customized offer.
We'll get back to you within 24 hours
Your data will be treated confidentially
Direct contact with our experts